Pinnacle Solutions ENG

Free Quality & Supplier Self-Evaluation

Free Quality & Supplier Self-Evaluation

Use this free self-evaluation to identify gaps in your quality system and supplier controls before paying for outside help. Score what you can prove today—not what you intend to do.

Download the Free Excel Self-Evaluation

Editable Excel workbook · automatic scoring · action plan included

Want to See a Completed Example?

Use the filled-out sample to see how a small product company can score the checklist, identify real gaps, create practical action items, and document completed resolutions.

Download the Completed Sample Workbook

See the supporting fixes too: The full sample improvement pack includes the example product definition, acceptance criteria, supplier requirements, supplier approval, receiving inspection, traceability, CAPA, training, audit, management review, and supplier scorecard used to close the gaps.

Download the Full Sample Improvement Pack ZIP

Scoring

  • 0 — Not in place: No defined process, requirement, record, or evidence.
  • 1 — Ad hoc / inconsistent: Activity happens, but depends on people, memory, email, or informal habits.
  • 2 — Defined but not consistent: A process exists, but execution, records, training, or follow-through are inconsistent.
  • 3 — Defined, implemented, evidenced: The process is consistently followed and supported by objective records.
  • N/A: Not applicable to your business or product.

How to use it: Write your score beside each question. Average the applicable scores in each section, then divide by 3 to convert to a percentage.

Interpretation: Below 50% = Critical Gap; 50–74% = Needs Improvement; 75–100% = Strong.

Requirements & Specifications

  1. Are product requirements clearly defined in controlled drawings, specifications, work instructions, samples, or acceptance criteria? Score: ____
  2. Are critical or significant characteristics identified where failure would create major customer, safety, regulatory, or functional risk? Score: ____
  3. Are inspection or test methods defined so two competent people would reach the same acceptance decision? Score: ____
  4. Are packaging, labeling, lot identification, certificates, and traceability requirements defined where applicable? Score: ____

Document & Change Control

  1. Do you know which revision of each key requirement is current and approved? Score: ____
  2. Are obsolete requirements prevented from being used at purchasing, inspection, production, and supplier locations? Score: ____
  3. Are product, material, process, tooling, supplier, or sub-tier changes reviewed before implementation? Score: ____

Supplier Qualification

  1. Are suppliers risk-classified based on product/process importance and potential failure impact? Score: ____
  2. Do new suppliers receive a documented capability/quality review before approval? Score: ____
  3. Are suppliers formally approved for a defined scope of products/processes rather than generally approved? Score: ____
  4. Are higher-risk suppliers subject to deeper qualification such as audit, FAI, sample approval, PPAP, or capability evidence? Score: ____

Purchasing & Flow-Down

  1. Do purchase orders or supplier agreements flow down current technical and quality requirements? Score: ____
  2. Do suppliers know when they must notify you before making changes? Score: ____

Incoming Inspection & Release

  1. Is incoming inspection based on defined risk, supplier performance, and product criticality rather than habit? Score: ____
  2. Are inspection results recorded with enough detail to prove what lot was checked, how, and against which requirement? Score: ____
  3. Is nonconforming incoming material physically or systemically controlled to prevent unintended use? Score: ____

Traceability

  1. Can you trace finished product or complaints back to supplier, material/lot, inspection status, and relevant production records where needed? Score: ____
  2. Can you identify which customers/orders received product from a suspect lot when necessary? Score: ____

Nonconformance & Corrective Action

  1. Is every significant nonconformance documented with clear defect description, requirement, quantity, lot, and disposition? Score: ____
  2. Are rework, use-as-is, return, scrap, and concession decisions authorized by appropriate people? Score: ____
  3. Do recurring or significant supplier defects trigger structured root-cause and corrective-action activity? Score: ____
  4. Do you verify corrective actions were effective rather than closing them when the supplier responds? Score: ____
  5. Are temporary containment actions clearly separated from permanent corrective actions? Score: ____

Calibration & Measurement

  1. Are inspection and test devices identified and calibrated or verified at appropriate intervals? Score: ____
  2. Is out-of-calibration impact reviewed to determine whether prior acceptance decisions may be invalid? Score: ____

Training & Competence

  1. Are people who make inspection, release, supplier-approval, and disposition decisions trained and competent? Score: ____
  2. Are new or revised quality procedures communicated and trained before use? Score: ____

Internal Audits

  1. Do you periodically verify that the quality and supplier processes are actually being followed? Score: ____
  2. Are audit findings corrected and tracked to closure? Score: ____

Supplier Performance

  1. Do you track meaningful supplier performance measures such as defects/PPM, delivery, responsiveness, SCAR closure, and audit results? Score: ____
  2. Do poor supplier results trigger defined escalation, development, increased inspection, requalification, or sourcing review? Score: ____

Complaints & Returns

  1. Are customer complaints/returns evaluated for supplier, material, process, and system causes? Score: ____
  2. Do complaint trends feed back into supplier controls, inspection plans, specifications, and corrective action? Score: ____

Management Review

  1. Does leadership periodically review quality and supplier performance, major risks, recurring failures, and needed resources? Score: ____
  2. Are quality objectives and improvement actions assigned to owners and tracked to completion? Score: ____

What to Fix First

Prioritize any score of 0 or 1 that affects product requirements, supplier approval, incoming inspection/release, traceability, nonconformance containment, or corrective action. Those gaps can allow defective or uncontrolled product to move through the system.

Download the Excel Self-Evaluation   Free QMS Templates   Want Pinnacle to review it with you? →

Scroll to Top